The Truth About Splenda Home
The Truth About Splenda Fact Versus Fiction
The Truth About Splenda Take Action
The Truth About Splenda News and Events
The Truth About Splenda Resources


January 27, 2005

Five Lawsuits Filed Against Splenda

Johnson & Johnson under fire concerning false advertising and misleading consumers about Splenda

Washington D.C. [January 27, 2005] -- False advertising lawsuits are mounting against chemical sweetener manufacturer Johnson & Johnson/McNeil for claims made about its chlorinated artificial sweetener Splenda. Five separate lawsuits across the U.S. have been filed thus far, three State Consumer Class Action suits and two independent Federal suits.

The complaints focus on violations of the Federal Lanham Act and violations of Florida and California statutes, all of which are designed to protect consumers against misleading corporate statements. All complaints allege deceptive and/or misleading representations made by Johnson & Johnson/McNeil in advertisements and marketing terminology in order to attract customers to purchase and consume the artificial sweetener Splenda.

“The Sugar Association believes, as do the consumers who filed the State Class Action suits, that Johnson & Johnson is misinforming consumers about the reality of the chlorinated product Splenda,” remarked James Murphy, counsel for the Sugar Association, which filed one of the lawsuits. “We feel the public needs to be aware that Splenda is an artificial chemical sweetener. Splenda is created with chlorine, and the final product does not have sugar in it. People need accurate nutritional information to make good decisions on what they are feeding their families.”

In its advertisements and on its product packaging, Johnson & Johnson/McNeil claims that “Splenda is made from sugar, so it tastes like sugar.” According to the suits, statements like this mislead consumers into thinking that Splenda is natural sugar without calories.  In fact, Splenda is not natural and does not taste like sugar.  The sweetness of Splenda derives from a chlorocarbon chemical that contains three atoms of chlorine in every one of its molecules.

The five lawsuits filed are:

State Consumer Class Action Cases

  1. Peggy Patton, On Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated vs. McNeil Nutritionals LLC filed in Santa Clara County, California on Dec. 6, 2004
  2. Marc Backer, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated vs. McNeil Nutritionals LLC filed in Los Angeles Country, California on Dec. 21, 2004
  3. Bobby Allen Green, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated vs. McNeil Nutritionals LLC filed in Duval County, Florida on Dec. 2, 2004


  1. Merisant vs. McNeil Nutritionals LLC filed in Philadelphia filed Nov. 26, 2004
  2. The Sugar Association vs. McNeilNutritionals LLC filed in Los Angeles on Dec. 10, 2004

For more information about the lawsuits filed against Johnson & Johnson/McNeil in relation to Splenda, or for information about the Truth About Splenda campaign (, please call Rich Masters at Qorvis Communications, 202-496-1000.



Are you concerned about the long-term health effects of Splenda?
Do you feel the Splenda advertising slogan “Made from Sugar, so it tastes like Sugar” is misleading?
Click here to get involved.

  Get the Facts  

Do you think there have been long-term studies on the health effects of Splenda?
Think Splenda is all natural? Is it safe to let your children eat Splenda? To find out the Truth About Splend, click here.